a criminal justice reform movement
starting nov. 1, 2018
Watch the doc
There is compelling evidence that Mr. Jones is innocent.
The key witness’ description of the shooter does not match Julius’.
New evidence shows that a juror used the n-word before jury deliberations, despite the the US Supreme Court making it clear that it does not tolerate blatant examples of racial prejudice.
As such, Mr. Jones’ rights have been violated under the State and Federal constitutions.